The Fed and the House Are Both Bringing on a Recession
Plus, Can the Fourth Amendment Survive Digital Surveillance?
Recently in The Bulwark:
You can support The Bulwark by subscribing to Bulwark+ or just by sharing this newsletter with someone you think would value it.
DESMOND LACHMAN: The Fed and the House Are Both Bringing on a Recession.
There is both good and bad news about our country’s economic outlook. The good news is that the Federal Reserve seems to be winning its fight against inflation. The bad news is that it appears likely that the cost of victory will be a recession caused by the Fed engaging in monetary policy overkill coincident with a looming fight over increasing the debt ceiling. The timing is perilous.
After allowing inflation to surge to a multi-decade high of 9.1 percent by means of an overly expansive monetary policy, the Fed has now dramatically reversed course. Last year, the Fed hiked interest rates on four occasions in unusually large steps of 75 basis points, making this the fastest pace of interest rate hikes since the early 1980s. At the same time, it has withdrawn market liquidity at the unprecedented pace of $95 billion per month by choosing not to roll over its maturing Treasury bond holdings. As dizzyingly loose as the Fed was in 2021 in response to the COVID emergency, it is now tightening with alarming severity.
The shift in attitudes about defense and foreign policy in Germany has been dramatic since the war in Ukraine began. Plus, will ripping off a dying dog be the tipping point for George Santos? Bill Kristol — fresh off a series of meetings in Berlin — joins Charlie Sykes today.
Bulwark+ members can listen to an ad-free version of these podcasts on the player of their choice. Learn more at Bulwark+ Podcast FAQ.
CORBIN BARTHOLD: Can the Fourth Amendment Survive Digital Surveillance?
The Fourth Amendment guarantees “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.” The Founders opposed the British practice of issuing “general warrants”—edicts that allowed government officers to undertake sweeping searches without suspicion. As Justice Robert Jackson put it: “The forefathers, after consulting the lessons of history, designed our Constitution to place obstacles in the way of a too permeating police surveillance.”
The advance of technology has long bedeviled Fourth Amendment jurisprudence. A century ago, in Olmstead v. United States (1928), a case involving the warrantless wiretapping of telephones, Louis Brandeis urged his fellow justices not to let the amendment wither as “subtler and more far-reaching means of invading privacy” become “available to the government.” They did not listen. The Supreme Court permitted the wiretaps, reasoning that the Fourth Amendment cares only about searches of “material things.” Brandeis saw that the “progress of science” would continue, making that position increasingly untenable. At length it became too embarrassing to maintain. The Court overturned Olmstead in 1967.
Meanwhile, in the world of George Santos… It’s not going great! His claims about his mother’s fate on 9/11 seem to be proven wrong, and there’s, uh, this allegation. If true, this'll be the thing that causes the House GOP to turn on him. Just you watch.
What happens to the pigs? Animal slaughter is a dirty business. While I’m not a descendent of the meat Swifts, my dad did work in a slaughterhouse in college. The stories he’d share after a couple glasses of wine were not for the faint of heart. Still, if we’re going to eat meat, we have to have slaughterhouses. And a recent investigation suggests it’s not as pretty as advertised.
A tale of two Americas… California vs. Florida. Meanwhile, in Florida, their governor is floating taking sales taxes off of gas stoves to own the libs.
How One Bad Court Pick in New York… Has Turned Into a National Quagmire.
Has OAN been ‘censored’? A court laughs off the question.
As meetings grow wild… officials try to tame public comment.
That’s it for me. Tech support questions? Email firstname.lastname@example.org. Questions for me? Respond to this message.
Editorial photos provided by Getty Images. For full credits, please consult the article.